Is it Beneficial for a Celebrity to Reveal a Major Illness?
View PDF | Print View
by: JeannieGiordano
Total views: 2
Word Count: 239
One of the most recent examples is Georgia Frontiere, the Rams owner, who died at 80 of breast cancer. Family members and team officials kept her illness a secret according to her wishes.
Deciding to reveal an illness can leave one feeling exposed and vulnerable. Having to worry about the added attention and press this kind of news can bring is especially difficult while battling disease.
It might seem obvious why a celebrity or public figure facing this decision would choose not to reveal a major illness. In addition to the unwelcome press, there are more reasons why a public figure might choose not to reveal their illness.
Being remembered for their work, not their disease is what most people desire. And, going public with a disease can be a career-ender, so many choose to keep their battles private.
It should be said however, that despite the difficulties in mentioning a serious illness to the public, great good can come from revealing it.
Raising awareness is a positive by-product of speaking publicly about a disease. It can also help to encourage those at risk to get screened.
Another example: Lance Armstrong, who just won his 7th Tour de France race, shed light on testicular cancer, even while his cancer had spread to his lungs and brain.
Why do some celebrities choose to reveal their illnesses? I believe it's because the act of revealing is purifying and restorative. The end-result is often clarity and a new purpose.
About the Author
YouReveal.com is a gateway portal for revealing secrets and confessions anonymously. Learn more about celebrities secrets and confessions, and see this unique and understanding environment.
HTML For Publishers
Please note: This article is free to reprint but all links must remain active.
Rating: Not yet rated
